The English-Speaking World Strikes Back

Is King Charles is considering offering America an associate membership in the Commonwealth? On the surface, it sounds like a novelty—a symbolic gesture to mark old ties. But if taken seriously, this is the kind of strategic imagination the English-speaking world desperately needs.

Forget the cries of “But 1776!” That war was about self-governance, not eternal estrangement. The world has changed. We’re not fighting redcoats in the woods—we’re facing a global axis of control: China’s digital dictatorship, the EU’s deadening bureaucracy, and California-style neo-utopianism that would rather regulate your stove than secure a border.

The Anglosphere is our answer.

America, Britain, Canada, Australia, and others—united not by force, but by shared language, market instincts, legal DNA, and a cultural backbone that still vaguely remembers the concept of liberty. What if these nations, scarred but unbroken by globalist overreach, began to see themselves as a civilizational bloc again?

A Pan-English-speaking Union wouldn’t be some kumbaya federation. It would be a flexible alliance of sovereign nations committed to enterprise, trade, rule of law, and freedom of thought—something the EU can’t deliver and China will never allow.

More than that, it would pressure our own internal saboteurs—progressives who believe America is systemically evil, and globalist technocrats who want you to own nothing and be grateful. Those voices would be drowned out by a louder, older, freer chorus.

We need to stop pretending we have to choose between isolation and submission. The real choice is between collapse and cohesion. Between moral cowardice and cultural courage. A revitalized Anglo order wouldn’t be nostalgic—it would be a new power center for the 21st century.

This would bolster the free market English speaking world.

This would create a unified English speaking power block

This would solve the discombobulation of post-Brexit.

If the king is serious, America should say yes.

And if he's not, maybe we should ask why not?